Equity investing is
the new gold rush. Or has been ever since BJP came to power in 2014.
Market’s thrive on
volatility. Punters love it. Clueless commoners loathe it.
One profits from the
others fear. The other is devoured by the one’s greed.
Modi’s BJP
provides an endless supply of volatility, through systemic jolts to
the economy (demonetisation, GST, LTCG on equity), and
socio-political acts borne of intolerance that nevertheless vitiate
the economic climate (harassing NGOs over origin of funds,
steamrolling environmental objections to infrastructure projects,
eroding the autonomy of national institutions, viz, the judiciary –
meddling in the collegium for appointments--, and the central bank –
vicious attacks on governors who did not tow the FM’s line on
demonetization and rate cuts).
An environment where
equity MFs have generated wealth for investors up unto 2017, fueled a
new found belief in the market’s potential. SIP investments
continue undeterred, although MF returns have suffered by comparison
in the past two years.
In search of ‘alpha’
(market beating) returns, the ambitious retail or high-net worth
individual turns to primary market offerings, aka IPOs. But can IPOs
lead to wealth creation for the common man, or even the HNI?
Let’s explore the
subject using the Rs 750-crore IPO of Ujjivan Small Finance Bank
(USFB), which was over-subscribed by 165.6 times on average, by the
third and final day of the IPO (Wed, 4th December 2019).
The retail investors
portion (10%), was subscribed 48.67 times.
The
non-institutional investors (NII) portion (15%) -- including HNIs--
was oversubscribed 473 times.
The qualified
institutional buyers portion (75%) was oversubscribed 110.7 times.
Applications were
constrained by a lot size and increment tick of 400 shares, at an
issue price of Rs 37.
Retail segment
customers are also constrained by a SEBI mandated maximum application
value of Rs 2 lakh. That makes for a maximum application size of 13
lots ( 200,000 / (400 * 37)).
However, due to
retail segment over-subscription, actual allotment is limited to a
single lot, per SEBI’s mandate to accommodate the largest pool of
retail customers. And that, by lottery system. Which means even
assuming the share price jumps 50% (to Rs 55) on listing day, and you
win the single lot lottery, your profit on selling one lot is just Rs
7200 (Rs 18 * 400).
Nope, an
oversubscribed IPO doesn’t generate wealth for the retail customer.
There exists an
unofficial gray-market for IPO shares. A gray-market premium
indicates high demand for an IPO, and could correlate to listing day
gains. Being an un-regulated market it comes with high counter-party
risks, but is used as a sounding board by HNIs for investing in an
IPO.
The HNI portion of
an IPO sees allotment on a proportional basis. That is if the issue
is over-subscribed 400 times, for every 400 shares applied, a single
share will be allotted. With the knowledge of gray-market premium
(which in Ujjivan SFB’s case was 50%), an HNI will commonly raise a
bridge loan from his broker at a low rate of interest, for a large
sum, say 1 crore, and that too on the last day of the issue. That
lets him apply for 675 lots (675 * 400 * 37). However, in the end
with an issue that is 400 times oversubscribed, he is allotted a
single lot (1 share for every 400, makes for less than two lots of
800). Not much to make in this scenario either.
All in all, IPOs
don’t seem to be major wealth creators for anyone, save sovereign
funds and domestic institutional investors (AMCs) that invest in the
pre-IPO phase as anchor investors to the issue.
A related issue is
the viability of an IPO from a pricing and profitability point of
view. An initial offer by a first time offer is likely to be much
more reasonably priced than an Offer For Sale (OFS).
The former is
usually to raise capital for business expansion or service debt. The
latter is usually a way for Private Equity (PE) investors to cash-in
on their investments in the company. And the PEs are usually marquee
VC brands.
Take the example of
the planned SBI Card IPO, which is an OFS by it’s PE investors. Do
you think their focus would be to reasonably price the IPO for retail
or on making a good return on their investment?
In the case of
Ujjivan SFB, the mandate was a dilution of promoter holding (courtesy
RBI), and the intended use is for Tier 1 capital adequacy
augmentation of the microfinance bank. The upper band of Rs 37 was at
a premium of 2.5 times to the book value (2.5 * P/BV) for 2019). Many brokerage houses hailed this as reasonable, due to potential for growth, and that explains the oversubscription and gray-market premium. But like I said earlier, IPOs are not really a wealth generator unless you're a QIB.
Caveat emptor. This is not an authoritative piece, and is basis my layman's research on IPOs as investment tools. That said, my understanding (and the math) could be faulty, and I welcome constructive criticism.